A Man of His Times

I was interested in what a former pastor of mine had to say about some things I had read that John Calvin had done that did not impress me. This pastor is an enthusiastic Calvinist and had recently written a tribute to Calvin, in honor of the day of his death (May 27, if you’re interested).

Now, the details of what Calvin did aren’t relevant to my discussion; my pastor’s response is what I want to focus on. His explanation, or perhaps excuse, for Calvin’s behavior is this: he was “a man of his times”.

I found this to be a surprising response. To paper over someone’s behavior with “everyone else is doing it” is hardly the defense I was expecting. Especially when dealing with a hugely popular and respected Christian patriarch (he has a whole theology named after him!), I was hoping for something a little more substantive.

Perhaps a little more about the particular incident would be helpful. I had written my pastor to ask about some oppressive practices I had read that Calvin participated in while in Geneva. His response included this statement: “People forget that virtually everyone in those days, especially those in the Roman Catholic Church, supported the execution of heretics. Calvin was a man of his times.”

Let me tell you my first response. I’d hate to be standing before the white throne on Judgment Day (assuming that’s not all some literary analogy) and tell Jesus, “everyone else was doing it.” Being a man of my times here in the 21st century is hardly a cause for boasting, and I can’t imagine it was any different in the 16th century.

Why, if I were a man of my times, what would I be doing today? Well, over 20% of us men commit adultery (some studies say 60%!). Half of us divorce. We cheat on our taxes and spend the profit on pornography. I need not go on.

I would hate to be called a man of my times. This would be the worst epitaph I can imagine. So now I’m thinking, what about my life, my morals, my behavior demonstrates that I am a man of my times? I’m afraid that these beliefs and behaviors are so much a part of me that I can’t identify them.

Here’s my hope: if I can act as much like Jesus as possible, then maybe I won’t need to worry about whether I am being a man of my times. I’ll be a man with eternity in mind, not current social custom. And perhaps, I’ll be one step ahead of John Calvin.

Short-term Missions

Here is a link to a recent USA Today article. I guess in my anti-news bias I clearly hear the digs against missions, instead of a clear message of what good kingdom work is being done.

However, I will agree that all short-term missions require good managment and training. As someone who has gone to the same area repeatedly, I would hate to find you are servicing the same needs over and over again and ignoring others. Or as stated in the article, you are “saving” the same kids many times. So we as stewards need to know the area we are going to, to the best of our ability. We also need to find good organizations which are truly following God and seeking His will and finding all the needs, not just the easy or the greatest reward for us.

Four Strikes

I spent the last week with a group of college kids, doing a service project in the inner city of Chicago. It was a great time. I didn’t know any of the kids before the trip, so this was truly a learning experience for me. And one thing I learned is that we are absolutely telling college kids the wrong things.

By “wrong”, I mean “inconsistent”. We want them to believe certain things and behave in certain ways, but we also expect certain other beliefs and behaviors which militate against the former. It happens in four areas.

Go West, Young Man

We tell our college kids that it’s time to grow up, to become independent. They must learn to think and act for themselves, to be responsible. They will succeed or fail on their own in college, because mom and dad aren’t there to make sure the homework gets done.

We also tell them to lean on God, to behave like a child toward him. They are to look to him for guidance and support, for direction and strength. They are not to lean on their own understanding. They are not to choose their own way.

Which one do they choose? Sure, the conflict is there for us “grown ups” as well, but the college years are a time when independence is pounded into these folks. I submit that these messages contradict each other, and the data backs me up. More on that later.

Grades Are Job 1

Who can deny that a college student’s primary responsibility is getting good grades? Does anyone tell his college-bound child, “Just do enough to get by”, or “70% is what I’m looking for, son” ? Of course not. We parents have an expectation that our children will be doing their absolute best. College is expensive, and time there is not to be wasted or misused.

At the same time, we expect spiritual growth from our children. However, the pressure of doing well in school takes its toll. Talking with some of the young adults on this trip, it seems that the spiritual equivalent of treading water is about all that many of them hope to achieve during their college years. And I don’t blame them: we demand so much of them each semester that for these kids to focus on developing their spiritual life seems virtually unattainable.

For example, which parent swould accept this statement from their college student: “I spent so much time in Bible study [or whatever] that I didn’t have time to do my best on the term paper, and I only got a C.” Sounds like a flimsy excuse, doesn’t it? Is there any activity or focus which we would accept as an excuse for a result below what our students are capable of? I’ll ask it again: is there any voluntary excuse for our students not doing their absolute best?

Sure, sure, we have similar pressures as adults. Work life often conflicts with spiritual life. I know that some (most? all?) companies will be happy if we devoted every waking hour to working for them. However, it’s a rare job that consumes us as much as attending college does. The pressure from parents, peers, and self to do well is high. Students are told that their careers, their future success, hinges on the results they deliver in college (untrue, but we tell them that). Do we dare tell them that success, in and out of the workplace, depends on things utterly unrelated to their GPA? Andy Stanley says, “You become successful the day you embrace the vision God has for your life.” What parents are risking telling their college kids that?

Show Me the Money

How many of us tell our college students to spend quantity time devoted to spiritual things over the summer? None of the kids I talked to got that message. They are working, working, working. (Ok, one of the guys doesn’t have a job this summer, as his athletic scholarship and other grants cover his schooling. But he’s by far the exception.)

The other kids, however, have the opposite story. They are working hard over the summer, earning money for school, necessary transportation, or other living expenses. And the jobs they have aren’t even contributing to their careers or teaching them life skills: one young man will be delivering pizzas, and a young woman will be waitressing.

This isn’t a knock on these students; not at all. It’s rather an indictment of us as parents that we tell our kids that it’s more important that they make a couple thousand bucks doing jobs which provide no training or long-term benefit, and we don’t make sure these same kids are serving their communities, encouraging their friends, or learning more about God. The mission trip we were on to start the summer is the only plan these kids had in the way of spiritual activity — one week, then off to work.

What parent will welcome this from their students: “I don’t see how I can have a summer job. I lead a Bible study for the middle schoolers twice a week, I meet with my accountability group every Friday, and with regular visits to the old folks home and tutoring inner city kids, there just isn’t time for a job. Besides, what company will have me when I’ll be gone on mission trips for three weeks?”

(As another example, I know a young man who wants to be a youth pastor. He just graduated from high school, and his parents nixed his plans to work for an inner city ministry over the summer. It wouldn’t make as much money as working the night shift on the loading dock of a big-box store in town. It makes me so mad, I could just….)

Debt: The American Way

My good friend Matt Schoenfeld of Heartland Financial Concepts tells me that the average credit card debt incurred by a college freshman is $1500, and it’s up to $3000 by the time he or she graduates. Bear in mind that this is credit card debt only; it doesn’t include school, car, or other debt. The total debt is around $20,000. This is an average, so there are many, many who have much more than that.

What are we telling our students, when we encourage them to start off their independent lives by shackling themselves to such a financial burden? Will they be free to serve God, to go where he leads them? How many can afford to become missionaries, to serve in poverty-stricken areas, to accept low-paying jobs where the need is greatest? I suspect that the majority will be worrying about how to pay off their loans, not about how to follow the call of God.

Yes, we adults are victims of the debt monster, too. It’s not right for us, either. I submit that there are two main causes for a Christian who wants to serve God to be unable to do so: one cause is shame, and the other is debt. To reference my buddy Matt again, who counsels many people with financial problems, he hears this statement over and over: “We really want to serve God. We’d love to be missionaries. However, we have this huge debt that we can’t get out from under.” It’s unfortunate that we’re starting our kids off with this strike against them.

And you’re out

So these are the four strikes I observed while spending a week with these wonderful kids. They had such a heart to serve the church we were sent to help, and to a man (and woman) they wanted to find a way to help more. But they had jobs to get to, and life had to go on. And this brings me to the data I mentioned earlier. Reports show that 75% of teens no longer share their parents’ religious views and/or stop attending church within two years of graduating from high school. With the pressures put on them during college to become independent, do well in school, make money, and incur debt, I’m surprised that 25% are still hanging on.

Divine authority?

I have noticed that my view of the Bible is changing over the last couple of years. Actually, what I think is happening is that I am actually forming a view of the Bible. I guess that sounds odd coming from a person who has been a Christian for over twenty years. I think what is happening is that I’ve stopped just accepting what others say about it, and as a result I’m developing a deeper respect for it. I am noticing, though, that I have a strong reaction against what I hear others say the Bible is and how we should look at it.

Let me start off by saying that I teach the Bible, and I really, really like reading it. I think it’s inspired. I’m not knocking the Bible, but just the way some people look at it. Here’s the latest example. I was looking over a website of a parachurch organization that a friend pointed out. They have a place where you can order some of their materials, and at the bottom of the order form is a link to their statement of faith. I clicked on the link and read the statement, and here’s the line about the Bible which bothered me: “Christians must submit to its divine authority.” I stopped reading and thought, “The Bible has authority over me? I have to submit to a book? When did this happen?”

Now, I guess the authors of this statement are thinking this: “God has authority over me. God wrote the Bible. Therefore, the Bible has authority over me.” However, the choice of words here is telling; the book itself has some sort of power. I told this to my wife, and she responded, “Ah, it’s a magic book.”

And that’s just it. The Bible isn’t a magic book. It has no authority in itself. (I’m sure this makes the fundies fume.) The Bible is a communication from the one who does have authority. Here’s an example: I recently won a court judgment against a tenant that I had to evict. My proof of this judgment is a piece of paper. I can take this paper and go to the tenant’s employer and begin to garnish wages. Now, the piece of paper has no authority in itself. It only represents the authority of its author, in this case the county government. The employer knows that the paper shows the wishes of the author, and he has bound himself to obey the author — not the paper.

I think the distinction is subtle, yet vitally important. Yes, the paper tells us what the author wants us to know. Yes, the reading the paper is just like hearing the author speak those written words into our ears. However, we have not bound ourselves to the paper. We owe our allegiance to the person who wrote the paper.

I heard a radio preacher the other day say much the same thing as was in this statement of faith. Several times he said we are to submit ourselves to the authority of the Bible. Nowhere did he mention that we are to submit to God, or to each other, or to our spouses. Sigh.

So we are substituting the Bible for God. We submit to the Bible. The Bible has authority. It’s “the Bible says….” and “the Bible teaches….” I disagree. God never gave authority to a book. He has authority, and he gives it to people. If those people write things down, then it’s still the authority of that person (and God behind him) that we recognize. There’s a big difference, as now I feel a connection to those people and the legacy they’ve left us, rather than just reading a textbook and feeling like there’s a test coming.

Valuable Perspective

Read this viewpoint this morning and wanted to share it. I’ve not heard it described this way before and find that it really brings some clarity to how Id been trying to wrestle with my thoughts on this.
“Using People

One of the prominent justifications for allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. really troubles me for human rights and justice reasons.

That argument is that Americans don’t want to do the jobs illegal immigrants fill, and they fill these jobs at below-market wages precisely because of their illegal status in the U.S., usually working outside of the labor laws. Like it or not, illegal immigrants fill an economic need to keep our overall costs to consumers down because higher costs could hurt our economy.

So essentially the justification is that we will import a permanent underclass to fill an economic us, coexisting in our society without ever fully assimilating with little or no hope of upward mobility because they are not legal. This justification seems less about immigration that means participation in the U.S. and more about a bottom-level working-poor class to serve an economic utility.

This justification is very different from the history of immigrants in our country who filled low-skill labor jobs, but who participated fully in the U.S., assimilated, and improved their socio-economic position. They not only filled an economic utility, but were primarily participants in the country because they were legal.

This sounds like it boils down to using a group of people for economic gain. I think it’s a despicable justification. In addition to the legal and security problems of illegal immigration, there is a serious moral problem of allowing a permanent underclass of human being for their economic utility. American immigration should not be about using people; it should be about welcoming them to fully participate legally in our country.
”
http://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=blog_iframe